World Shakuhachi Discussion / Go to Live Shakuhachi Chat
You are not logged in.
This is a hanko or inscription on a circa 1940-1950 Myoan 3.2 attributed to a Zen monk in Kyoto. Does anybody have a clue about this? It looks like it's scratched in rather than stamped.
Offline
Tairaku wrote:
This is a hanko or inscription on a circa 1940-1950 Myoan 3.2 attributed to a Zen monk in Kyoto. Does anybody have a clue about this? It looks like it's scratched in rather than stamped.
http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc12 … 2hanko.jpg
No idea. It surely looks carved in and not burned. As far as I see it looks more like a free hand stylized Kanji or possible Bonji. Just went torugh my Bonji dictionary and all I could find near was O to be near it and even some of the strokes were off. So if this is indeed a bonji it is poorly carved as far as the skills of the carver and knowledge of bonji.
Offline
Jon wrote:
looks a lot like a "ru" る
Could very well be but what is the square or bubble inside the top part doing? As far as I know there is way to write る in this way unles the carver was that much sloppy. I had a good feeling about the bonji thing but then again the bubble or dot in Bonji are usually external and not internal.
Last edited by Gishin (2008-08-27 23:02:42)
Offline
I got it from an older guy in California who said he got it from a monk in Kyoto after WWII. So I'm the third owner. Maybe it's something the Californian scratched on it. Everything about the flute is consistent with a Myoan flute of that vintage, except the length which of course is extreme. Has anybody else seen a 3 shaku plus flute that age?
Hankos, man it really makes you appreciate guitar manufacturers......Fender, Gibson, Martin, right up there on the headstock!
Here's a pic of the whole flute.
Offline
Sure looks like a beauty... how does it play?
Zak
Offline
It's demanding but compelling once you get started. Not for the weak.
Offline
My wife, who is the kanji expert in the family, thinks it is might be the onyomi (Chinese reading) 'eki' of the kanji 易. An ekisha is a fortune teller.
Last edited by Daniel Ryudo (2008-08-28 11:41:45)
Offline
Daniel Ryudo wrote:
My wife, who is the kanji expert in the family, thinks it is might be the onyomi (Chinese reading) 'eki' of the kanji 易. An ekisha is a fortune teller.
Could make some sense as well if it is in freehnad art calligrahy style called sosho 草書. But to my wife this one made no sense and looked pretty sloppy to her. But for now I feel this is mostly a freehand Kanji or possible bonji that can be identified by the writer himslef or people that had flutes by him before.
Offline
There's an old hiragana character that looks similar which is read 'e' (sounds like ei). If that's it, it's poorly written too. Japanese people are too schooled most of the time to write so poorly. I put my bet on the CA guy.
Offline
易 is an interesting possibility. Normally freehand 易 have an extra line or squiggle or something in the bottom half (and be more stretched vertically, actually), but this character is obviously stylized.
It also looks a lot like 男 (man), except without the final stroke (the one that would end on the bottom left).
There is a good chance that the top part is 日 or 田 or something similar, in any case.
It probably isn't 'e' (ゑ) because of that top part (that vertical stroke in the upper left). I would be surprised if it were any of the kana.
I don't know much about Siddham (bonji), but I'm skeptical of that idea because this looks so much like kanji.
(Not trying to be a jerk, just trying to help narrow down the possibilities logically.)
Offline
No-sword wrote:
(Not trying to be a jerk, just trying to help narrow down the possibilities logically.)
No prob . But yes there is a couple of bonji that would have been in the ballpark if it was not for the extra square or bubble on the top part.
Now what is interesting is that whatever kanji we found so far it still would not make much sense for a signature. Maybe it was not a signature but just some stuff the owner wanted to carve in for whatever reason.
Offline
I can't lend any input as to whether it is a Kana, Kanji, Bonji or a Roman numeral (well maybe not a Roman numeral), but the square or bubble part, Gishin, looks to me to not be part of the Hanko. It looks to me as some kind of dent or ding in the bamboo that just happens to be in the middle of the hanko. If you look at the two parts, the hanko is darkened, either through age or ink/burn/etc while the dent is less darkened - likely newer.
Just a photographers observation.
Damon
Offline
nomaD43 wrote:
I can't lend any input as to whether it is a Kana, Kanji, Bonji or a Roman numeral (well maybe not a Roman numeral), but the square or bubble part, Gishin, looks to me to not be part of the Hanko. It looks to me as some kind of dent or ding in the bamboo that just happens to be in the middle of the hanko. If you look at the two parts, the hanko is darkened, either through age or ink/burn/etc while the dent is less darkened - likely newer.
Just a photographers observation.
Damon
Could also very well be as you said but I still feel it looks prety well defined. Anyway so far no matter what it is we did not reach any conclusions that were very helpfull to Tairaku unfortunatly in finding any clear meanings to the carving.
Offline
So negative! Brian can speak for himself, but we have at least established that it is definitely Japanese, probably a single character, and we also have two good candidates for what the character is.
If the kanji is 易, then it might be pronounced "eki" or "i" as part of a name or pseudonym, or it might mean "change" or "divination" (that character is the "I" in "I Ching") or "easy".
If the kanji is 昌, then it might be any of the following as part or all of a name or pseudonym: shō, aki, akira, masa, atsu, suke, masashi, yoshi, sakae. Or it might be being used for its meaning: brilliance, prosperity, clarity.
At least one of those is wrong (maybe both are!), but it still beats "unknown squiggle" as far as possibilities for investigation go.
Last edited by No-sword (2008-08-29 09:04:32)
Offline
ummm....
just a thought..... it kinda looks to me like a stylized zodiac symbol for "Aries"....the ram...
i can't read japanese so i may be way off base......but that's what it looks like to me.
jacques
Offline
No-sword wrote:
So negative! Brian can speak for himself, but we have at least established that it is definitely Japanese, probably a single character, and we also have two good candidates for what the character is.
At least one of those is wrong (maybe both are!), but it still beats "unknown squiggle" as far as possibilities for investigation go.
Yes taking it from this angle can surely at least give us some meat to chew on and ask around makers or other collectors etc in Japann if ever they have seen such a thing.
The problem on my side wanting stuff to be clean cut and non sloppy stems from the stuff that made me go to Japan at first. I used to collect and sell antique Japanese swords so on any swords if we saw such crappy carvings of this type either on the blade or tang this almost automatically indicates a poorly made sword or one that has been tampered with by some incompetent. Now that being said I always aplied this gut feeling to other Japanese crafts and antiques and was usually on the ball with the value,age. quality etc. Since usually Japanese craftsmen that will finish a product that should bear their name will have at least a good hanko or if carving it will make sure it is a nice and clean job. Which leads me to think that put aside the meaning of the writing that this carving must have been made by the owner.
Offline
jaybeemusic wrote:
.... it kinda looks to me like a stylized zodiac symbol for "Aries"....the ram...
jacques
Or a "version" (aka improper rendering) of the Sanskrit or Tibetan OM. That would be consistent with the California connection, too.
Offline
mystery hanko hand etched into bamboo.
First image:
1. Original
2. Inverted color from original
3. Posterized color level 2 from original
4. Inverted and posterized to level 2
Second image:
Column 1: Presented in 4 different orientations
Column 2: Presented in 4 different orientations with out the "bubble".
Offline
Chris Moran wrote:
mystery hanko hand etched into bamboo.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3213/280 … 12d6_o.jpg
First image:
1. Original
2. Inverted color from original
3. Posterized color level 2 from original
4. Inverted and posterized to level 2
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3197/280 … e4af_o.jpg
Second image:
Column 1: Presented in 4 different orientations
Column 2: Presented in 4 different orientations with out the "bubble".
Hell when rotated it looks like some of the Tibetan type of sanskrit.
Offline
Thanks to everybody for using their brainpower to unravel the mystery of this flute. I find it intriguing to play a Myoan flute of this vintage which is so LONG. I think when you play a vintage flute you bring the bamboo to life and honor the original maker and players who used it before. So it's fun and interesting to know about the maker and history of the flute.
Offline
So...um....what DO we now know about this hanko?
Mostly, we seem to have pointed out what it isn't.
Offline
edosan wrote:
So...um....what DO we now know about this hanko?
Mostly, we seem to have pointed out what it isn't.
Yep. Well at least we know it DOESN'T say "Watazumido" or "Nishimura Koku" or "Rickenbacker".
Offline