World Shakuhachi Discussion / Go to Live Shakuhachi Chat
You are not logged in.
Hello makers around the world.
I have recently had many inquiries regarding ji-nashi in D. This seems to be because people have fallen in love with the soft ji-nashi sound, but still want to play with their teachers or perhaps even still play sankyoku.
Now, ji-nashi in D (like any other length) can have very different sonorities depending on how the maker has made the utaguchi angle and many other factors. What is common topic among the people contacting me is, that they want as much as possible to have a D ji-nashi with a soft sound. I have a wonderful Murai in D, which has a very soft and nice sound.
I began to do a project with a few ji-nashi makers in Japan while I was there this time around. They try make ji-nashi tuned to D, and then they send them to me to be played and commented at.
What I see as a common thread is, that the chi in the kan register is way too sharp in many of these flutes. I have found it interesting that this problem has been prevailing.
So I wanted to ask the makers for advice.
Perry, you are experienced in the 'spot-tuning' technique, adding a little ji to the bore. Would you be able to come with a general advice - although I know each bamboo requires their own 'treatment'? Where and how should the spot-tuning be? Or would you deal with this problem in another way (generally speaking)?
Ken, you are more into the subtraction technique. Can you give me a general advice as well on this particular problem?
If any of the other makers on the forum has any ideas, please share!
Kiku
Last edited by Kiku Day (2007-12-04 04:59:46)
Offline
You can flatten chi in a non-permanent way by putting some Elmer's glue around the top half of the re hole.
Most vintage flutes have sharp chi.
Offline
Yes, many vintage shakuhachi have a sharp chi. One possible aesthetic reason for this was to keep the holes equidistant. Nowadays players usually prefer that chi is on A.
If the flute is already made, like Tairaku says, you can fill the undercut or a little bit of the hole on the north side. (nearest blowing edge) Grinding at or around the 1/2 point between the third hole and the blowing edge is also something to look for. Test it by adding at this area, if it sharpens the pitch drastically, you know you're at the hot spot. Be careful with what it does to other notes though. (All this is assuming all other notes and octaves are on pitch) If not, the approach will vary.
If the flute is not made yet, it's easiest to stray from the older (aesthetically equidistant) specs. Move hole three slightly south. Move hole four slightly north. Then, it's closer to "pitch."
I would say that in situations where one note is off, and if it can easily be fixed by adjusting the hole, and if there are no other issues, it is often easier to adjust the hole rather than adjust the bore. Adjusting the bore can still work, but doing it to fix a hole drilling error can invite problems! I've found bore work is best for tone problems, octave tuning and some multiple hole tuning problems.
Ken
Offline
Hi Kiku,
Thanks for your questions. The biggest problems for your students will be the kan octave tuning.
Brian and everything Ken says is applicable. I would deal with the Chi hole but if you want to try Spot Tuning, I would drop the bead so that it hangs just below the Chi hole. Tape the end outside of the flute. Check that area first then up and around the Chi hole. If it's a wide bore flute, this might help some notes in kan. You always have to weight out what it does to the general timbre and response of the entire flute. If it seems like it's working, try different sized beads and see what works best. If it works and you want to add something, the simplest thing is to add five minute epoxy, mix a bit and add the same amount as the size of your bead using a small thin rod. I like to use bamboo shish kabab skewers. I've seen some flutes with a glob right at the spot but I like to smear the epoxy along the internal perimeter wall. The epoxy dries to a shiny coat and should require no other work, unless you coat the bore.
The person who knows what the flute should do will make the best choices. It will affect the Ou notes and Hi Go, among others.
I would use five minute epoxy on the top of the hole to shrink it. Since it cures quickly, you can add a gob and have it sit uniformly at the top. You just have to experiment to figure out your window of working time. Too soon and you have to keep moving the flute so that the glue doesn't go everywhere. Too late and you'll have a dried glob on your stick. You can try to tape the top section of the hole first to see what that does.
Mujitsu wrote:
If the flute is not made yet,...Move hole three slightly south. Move hole four slightly north. Then, it's closer to "pitch."
Ken
If funny, I just pointed this very thing out during the flute making section of Michael's camp. I had everyone do the math for the entire flute first then had them correct the sharp chi by subtracted a centimeter there and then adding a cm to Ri.
Based on my experience on making jinashi 1.8s, I look at size of the bore first, then make the adjustments on where the holes should fall. If the bore is small, it will not waver to far from the formula. But if the bore is large, I automatically drill the first hole sharper so that the other holes will be better placed. A large bore 1.8 will have flat holes if the standard formula for measuring is used. At least in my experience.
I hope this helps. Please do let us know the results of your actions.
Namaste, Perry
Offline
Thank you all 3 for your advice.
I will let the makers know what you guys said. I will not experiment myself as I am done with flute-making. I did it for 10 years and loved it, but I think it is very hard to do both playing and making seriously... so for me, playing it is!
Closing the hole on the north side or moving it down is also something I have tried to do myself when chi in both octaves were sharp. But would it work even when it really only is in the kan register, it is sharp.
Kiku
Last edited by Kiku Day (2007-12-05 04:07:15)
Offline
Kiku Day wrote:
Closing the hole on the north side or moving it down is also something I have tried to do myself when chi in both octaves were sharp. But would it work even when it really only is in the kan register, it is sharp.
Kiku
Kiku,
Unfortunately, that will probably flatten chi otsu as well. Then, it's a matter of playing with the quarter points between chi and the blowing end. Or, if you are aware that chi kan is sharper than chi otsu when the hole is first drilled, you can always enlarge the hole south* instead of north. (this works best with big holes) If you can get chi kan to be right on pitch and chi otsu to be flat, then you can probably sharpen chi otsu by adding in the bore around the hole (a little behind often works) or at or around the half way point. Sometimes, that's an easier fix. Sometimes not. It seems it's best to base these decisions on what else is happening to the flute so you end up doing the least amount to fix the most. It's a gutsy call!
Ken
* - By enlarging the hole to the south I don't mean that it will flatten the note. Actually it sharpens it less than enlarging it to the north. The idea is that you start very flat and work it up to pitch. That way it gives you more options to work with.
Offline