World Shakuhachi Discussion / Go to Live Shakuhachi Chat
You are not logged in.
I'm slowly learning the piece Shizukesa, and there's tounging in something like the last third. I can't do that as yet, so I'm wondering if it's okay to play it publicly someday without the tounging, in case I never get it down. I wouldn't usually change a piece like that, but I like the piece a lot, and want to play it.
Any opinions on this?
-Eddie
Offline
Dont you think it is a good idea to fully understand a piece, technically, structually and so on before you consider performing it in public?
Offline
I see that I didn't say something important in my original post: I don't have the music for this piece, I'm just learning it off the "Komuso" CD by Seldin. What I was wondering was if the sheet music itself calls for the tounging, or is that Seldin's interpretation?
-E
Offline
Ronnie Seldin wrote it, so it's a pretty good guess that it's his interpretation.
The technique he is using in that segment of the piece is called 'tamane', and it's usually done by vibrating the glottis in the back of the throat (as in gargling...). Some players do it with the tip of the tongue instead, but I think that is much more difficult, since the tip of the tongue is then interfering directly with the airstream near the lips.
In the case of Shizukesa, Ronnie is able to slow the vibration cycle down quite a bit--it's more often done at a higher speed. Good effect there...
eB
Last edited by edosan (2006-03-19 17:44:32)
Offline
edosan wrote:
Ronnie Seldin wrote it, so it's a pretty good guess that it's his interpretation.
The technique he is using in that segment of the piece is called 'tamane', and it's usually done by vibrating the glottis in the back of the throat (as in gargling...). Some players do it with the tip of the tongue instead, but I think that is much more difficult, since the tip of the tongue is then interfering directly with the airstream near the lips.
In the case of Shizukesa, Ronnie is able to slow the vibration cycle down quite a bit--it's more often done at a higher speed. Good effect there...
eB
Really? I can do flutter tongueing and not do the glottal one. I've heard that most people can do one or the other. Other people say anyone should be able to do both.
How many people here can do one or the other and how many can do both? Neither?
Eddie, if you continue to teach yourself advanced pieces like this, when you start taking lessons you will have a lot of bad habits and techniques to unlearn. Most people learn basics before advanced pieces.
Offline
I seem to get in my own way when trying to do the flutter tongue 'tamane', so I haven't put as much effort into it--the glottal one works well for me, though.
Offline
Regarding the premature 'learning' of advanced pieces:
A while back when I was admiring honkyoku from afar, and still confining my playing mostly to minyo (which I still love), I attempted to teach myself a piece off a Riley Lee album ('Ryuhei', from 'Mountain Valley'). I had a flute of the same length as that on the recording, and I new enough notation to somewhat transcribe the fingerings, but I was still pretty ignorant of how nayashi and pitch-bending worked.
What came out on the page was a mish-mash of VERY complex 'notation' which was far more difficult to follow than it need have been. Fortunately, I gave up on that piece for a while, content to just continue listening to it. Later, when I realized how things actually worked, it was a revelation how 'easy' it actually was to play through the piece--still a challenge, but doable, sensible.
Motto:
It's easy if you know how...
eB
Offline
Tairaku wrote:
How many people here can do one or the other and how many can do both? Neither?
The glottal version has always been inate for me. As a trumpet player in middle school, I realized I could do this quite easily. Flutter tounging has never been that easy, and I have yet to successfully employ it in music. I can, however, with a ton of concentration, force out some fluttering occassionally. This leads me to believe that if really wanted to work the ability, I could probably get it to come out.
If you can speak a language that requires rolling your r's, you could always tap into that part of your brain to a flutter tonguing jump start
Offline
Hello all,
I was trying the flutter tongueing the other day, just to fool around a bit as I don't play any piece that needs it and I could get something (a ver limited "something" I must say) using the tongue. Being Spanish, as Travis mentioned, I find it quite easy to move the tip of the tongue in that manner. But also, as Ed mentioned above the tongue gets on the way of the air stream and is a bit of a disaster (I guess there must be a way around this). I've never tried the glottal one but it looks quite challenging, to say the least...
Offline
I cannot flutter my tongue so i taught myself to use my glottal area. Took about 3 years from when i decided to learn this technique till i could use it with real control.
I once read that using the tongue to flutter, such as in the spanish "rr" sound, is something that one can or cannot do, apparently because of genetics. I was told you cannot teach this to yourself. Is this true?
I have yet to find any wind players who can do both. Perhaps Evan Parker?
phil
Offline
I can do the flutter tongueing but cannot do the glottal one; haven't given up yet though. Kakizakai sensei recommends gargling with a tiny bit of water first to get the feeling of the glottal technique.
Offline
philipgelb wrote:
.
I once read that using the tongue to flutter, such as in the spanish "rr" sound, is something that one can or cannot do, apparently because of genetics. I was told you cannot teach this to yourself. Is this true?
phil
It IS a fact that whether one can roll one's tongue lengthwise (like a hot dog bun protruding from the mouth...) or not, is genetically determined, so there could also be a genetic connection to flutter/not flutter.
eB
Offline
Tairaku wrote:
How many people here can do one or the other and how many can do both? Neither?
I can do both, although the flutter tonguing comes more naturally. I started flutter tonguing with the Native American flute because it is a fairly common (and overused) technique for that instrument. It is harder to utilise with a non-fipple flute like a shakuhachi or side-blown flute, because it interferes with the embouchure. Once you have done it with the NAF you have enough idea of what it should sound like to get it working with non-fipple flutes.
The glottal one should be easier because it doesn't affect the embouchure, but it is more difficult to describe. Once you get the feeling of doing it the first time it is not that hard.
Offline
philipgelb wrote:
I have yet to find any wind players who can do both.
I can do both, though neither to my satisfaction.
The tip of the tongue comes more easily for me, and I used it on a silver flute (and Spanish class) many years ago in High School. It sounds too harsh on a shakuhachi (in my opinion) so I've been gradually working on my uvula. I'm sure it's just a matter of practice.
I attended a workshop on Koten Sugomori from Yoshio Kurahashi where he said that his teacher said that some parts should be played tip-of-the-tongue and some parts with the uvula flutter. Alas, Kurahashi couldn't do them both. (I think he said he's a tip-of-the-tongue person.)
James
Offline