World Shakuhachi Discussion / Go to Live Shakuhachi Chat
You are not logged in.
People often say that the inlay in utaguchi isn't important. I have no trouble believing that there is no difference in sound regardless of the type of inlay or lack of one. What I'm curious about is how does the inlay survive over years compared to just a simple bamboo utaguchi. Every single old shakuhachi I've seen always had an utaguchi inlay of some kind. I have yet to see a shakuhachi that is older than me that has no inlay at all.
Has anyone on the forum seen/owned a shakuhachi that was, say, over 50 years old and had no inlay of any kind? How was edge on the utaguchi? Based on absolutely nothing I'd guess that natural utaguchi would become dull much faster than one made out of something like metal or bone. The root-end of many old shakuhachi tends to be much smoother and the individual roots tend to become almost round at the ends. I'd assume that the same thing happens to the blowing edge as well even if it is more carefully kept.
Offline
Hi Amok,
amokrun wrote:
...Has anyone on the forum seen/owned a shakuhachi that was, say, over 50 years old and had no inlay of any kind? How was edge on the utaguchi? Based on absolutely nothing I'd guess that natural utaguchi would become dull much faster than one made out of something like metal or bone.
Here are a few pre-refurbishing photos of an old flute I worked on:
I've worked on many old flutes that didn't have inlays. Many of which were made by Komuso. Some are in great shape, without chips and dings. Some have been pretty beaten up. I would say the typical well-cared-for old utaguchi would show a little roundness on the edge.
When this one came to me, it was in pretty bad shape. It had a layer of caked in dust in the bore. It also had severe worm damage at the root. As you can see, the utaguchi is chipped and lost some of it's original edge, but it actually worked well.
The flute is pretty old. It's a 1.75 length with a large bore pitched in D. My guess is around 100 years or older. Probably made by a monk. I'm sure it's older than you:)
The root-end of many old shakuhachi tends to be much smoother and the individual roots tend to become almost round at the ends. I'd assume that the same thing happens to the blowing edge as well even if it is more carefully kept.
Old flutes often have shaved roots. I would say this was a crafting choice rather than a product of aging.
Here is a 2.3 I finished a few months back. This flute felt like a Myoan style flute so I finished it with it's visual aesthetics. Myoan flutes are among the oldest style shakuhachi and often have shaved roots. But, a contributing factor that affected my decision to shave shave this one down was a few missing roots.
Namaste, Perry
Offline
Thank you, that was much more detailed explanation than I could have hoped for. I guess that lack of inlay isn't such a recent idea after all. Come to think of it, monks who made instruments for themselves without great tools or resources could very well have opted for natural utaguchi since it requires nothing but a small saw or a file to make. It is actually rather amazing that some have survived to this day while remaining playable. Too bad that the society as whole no longer makes things built to last.
By the way, I love the root end in the flute you made. I was rather surprised as I generally don't like shaved root ends on many flutes. Looks like there are times when it works and times when it doesn't. I'd say you made a great decision there.
Offline